I guess a lot of it depends on what the definition of religion is... does it include the membership in a colletive unit? Can one be a religious person and not belong to an organized religion?
Traveling the world has helped me be more realistic in my views of the world. Been all over...
It could be called social darwism to an extent. If anything Religious Anarchism unfetters the person from the organizational aspect of religion and allows for the person to free in their interpretation of god. My problem is not with religion it self as anything can be considered a religion... it is the organizational aspect that does not allow for self determination and expression that I have a problem with.
Depends on the term "fan" means. I have read Bakunin enough to say he has said some good things but I tend to follow myself in regards to my own philosophy. As a Religious Anarchist I believe that those who are naturally good do not need the rules of a religion to follow God.... they will naturally do what is needed to be "saved" or whatever you want to call it. In short, organized religion has its place but it sure is not for everyone.
I have studied all around the world and have seen too many different things to be a close minded religious fanatic.
Favorites
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Furl
Magnolia
StumbleUpon
Google
Yahoo MyWeb
